Grounding Conductor Size Calculator
Size a grounding electrode conductor from NEC Table 250.66, or an equipment grounding conductor from Table 250.122 — two different tables answering two different questions, on one page because they are so often confused.
Last checked against the code
Grounding Conductor Size Calculator
NEC (US)—
Copper
—
Aluminium or copper-clad
How this was looked up
- Indexed by
- —
- Table row
- —
How this is calculated
The grounding electrode conductor runs from the service equipment to the grounding electrode — the driven rods, the metal underground water pipe, the rebar in the footing. Its purpose is establishing the system's reference to earth: limiting the voltage imposed by lightning and by contact with higher-voltage lines, and stabilising voltage to ground during normal operation. It is not a fault-current path, and earth is a poor conductor for that purpose anyway.
Its size comes from the largest ungrounded service-entrance conductor, on the reasoning that a bigger service implies a bigger system to reference. Table 250.66 is a band table — each row covers a range of service conductor sizes, and the ranges differ between copper and aluminium service conductors, which is why the material of the service conductor is an input even though it is not the material of the conductor being sized.
The equipment grounding conductor does something else entirely. It runs with the circuit conductors, bonds the metal enclosures along the way, and provides a low-impedance path back to the SOURCE — not to earth — so that a fault between a hot conductor and an enclosure draws a large current and opens the overcurrent device quickly. Under normal conditions it carries nothing.
That purpose determines its index. Table 250.122 asks for therating of the overcurrent device, because the conductor has to pass enough current, for long enough, to trip that specific device. Not the load current, not the conductor ampacity — the device.
Worked example
One full calculation with real numbers, so you can follow along and check the tool by hand.
Two examples, because the page has two halves and doing one would leave the other looking like a footnote.
Grounding electrode conductor. A service run in400 kcmil copper. Table 250.66 is entered with the largest ungrounded service conductor, and 400 kcmil falls in the over 350 through 600 kcmil band of the copper column. That row gives 1/0 AWG copper, or3/0 AWG if the electrode conductor itself is aluminium.
Then check the caps before pulling it. If this conductor's only job is reaching a driven ground rod, 250.66(A) says it need not be larger than 6 AWG copper — a long way below the 1/0 AWG the table gives. On a concrete-encased electrode the cap is 4 AWG. The full table size is for a run to a water pipe or a ground ring.
Equipment grounding conductor. A branch circuit protected by a100 A breaker. Table 250.122 is entered with the device rating, 100 A is a printed row, and it gives8 AWG copper or6 AWG aluminium.
Note what was not asked. Not what the circuit draws, not what size the circuit conductors are, not how long the run is. Only the breaker — because the only thing this conductor ever has to do is make that breaker trip.
Now put the two side by side. A 100 A service would run roughly 3 AWG copper conductors, and Table 250.66 gives those an 8 AWG electrode conductor — the same 8 AWG the 100 A breaker gets from 250.122. At that amperage the two tables happen to agree, which is exactly why the confusion survives. Go up to 400 A and the electrode conductor is 1/0 while the equipment conductor is 3 AWG: twice the area, from the same nominal amperage. The agreement at the bottom is a coincidence, not a relationship.
Visual comparison
- GEC — Table 250.66
- EGC — Table 250.122
| Amperage | GEC — Table 250.66cmil | EGC — Table 250.122cmil | Sizes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 A | 16510 | 16510 | GEC 8 AWG · EGC 8 AWG |
| 150 A | 26240 | 26240 | GEC 6 AWG · EGC 6 AWG |
| 200 A | 41740 | 26240 | GEC 4 AWG · EGC 6 AWG |
| 250 A | 66360 | 41740 | GEC 2 AWG · EGC 4 AWG |
| 300 A | 66360 | 41740 | GEC 2 AWG · EGC 4 AWG |
| 350 A | 105600 | 52620 | GEC 1/0 AWG · EGC 3 AWG |
| 400 A | 105600 | 52620 | GEC 1/0 AWG · EGC 3 AWG |
Source: NEC 2023 Tables 250.66 and 250.122, at 75 °C copper service conductors
Reference tables
Both tables in full, and worth keeping side by side for the same reason they share a page. Notice how differently they are shaped: the first is seven bands covering every service from a small dwelling to a large industrial one, and the second is a row per device rating running from a 15 A lighting circuit to 6,000 A switchgear.
Use them when you already know which conductor you are sizing and just want the row. If you are not certain which one applies, use the calculator instead — it says which question it answered next to every number it gives, which a printed table cannot.
| Service conductor, copper | Service conductor, aluminium | GEC copper | GEC aluminium |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 or smaller | 1/0 or smaller | 8 AWG | 6 AWG |
| 1 or 1/0 | 2/0 or 3/0 | 6 AWG | 4 AWG |
| 2/0 or 3/0 | 4/0 or 250 kcmil | 4 AWG | 2 AWG |
| Over 3/0 through 350 kcmil | Over 250 through 500 kcmil | 2 AWG | 1/0 AWG |
| Over 350 through 600 kcmil | Over 500 through 900 kcmil | 1/0 AWG | 3/0 AWG |
| Over 600 through 1100 kcmil | Over 900 through 1750 kcmil | 2/0 AWG | 4/0 AWG |
| Over 1100 kcmil | Over 1750 kcmil | 3/0 AWG | 250 kcmil |
| Device rating | Copper | Aluminium |
|---|---|---|
| 15 A | 14 AWG | 12 AWG |
| 20 A | 12 AWG | 10 AWG |
| 30 A | 10 AWG | 8 AWG |
| 40 A | 10 AWG | 8 AWG |
| 60 A | 10 AWG | 8 AWG |
| 100 A | 8 AWG | 6 AWG |
| 200 A | 6 AWG | 4 AWG |
| 300 A | 4 AWG | 2 AWG |
| 400 A | 3 AWG | 1 AWG |
| 500 A | 2 AWG | 1/0 AWG |
| 600 A | 1 AWG | 2/0 AWG |
| 800 A | 1/0 AWG | 3/0 AWG |
| 1,000 A | 2/0 AWG | 4/0 AWG |
| 1,200 A | 3/0 AWG | 250 kcmil |
Notes and exceptions
The caps on 250.66 are not exceptions in the rare sense. Most residential services connect to driven rods, and 250.66(A) caps that run at 6 AWG copper regardless of what the table gives. A concrete-encased electrode caps at 4 AWG under (B), and a ground ring at the size of the ring conductor under (C). Which one applies depends on the electrode actually installed, which is not an input here — so the calculator gives the table figure and says to check.
Separately derived systems have their own rule. A transformer secondary, a generator or a UPS output that is a separately derived system takes its grounding electrode conductor from 250.30(A)(5), sized to Table 250.66 but with the derived phase conductors as the index rather than the service conductors. The arithmetic is the same table; the input is not.
Aluminium has placement restrictions the table does not mention.250.64(A) bars aluminium and copper-clad aluminium grounding conductors from being terminated within 450 mm (18 in.) of the earth, from direct contact with masonry or earth, and from corrosive environments. On the usual run to a driven rod, that generally rules aluminium out whatever the table's aluminium column says.
Neither table sizes a bonding jumper. Main bonding jumpers, system bonding jumpers and supply-side bonding jumpers are sized under 250.28 and 250.102, which reference Table 250.102(C)(1) rather than either table on this page. They look similar and they are a different lookup.
Common mistakes
Using the EGC table when you need GEC sizing, or the reverse
The error this page exists to prevent, and it is silent — both tables hand back a believable size and neither can tell you that you asked the wrong question. The quickest self-check: if you did not have to look up a breaker rating, you were not in 250.122.
NEC 2023 250.66, 250.122
Sizing an EGC from the load or the conductor instead of the device
Table 250.122 asks for the rating of the overcurrent device, not the current the circuit draws and not the ampacity of the conductors. The EGC has to carry enough fault current to open that specific device, which is why the device is the index.
NEC 2023 250.122
Missing the proportional upsizing rule
Where circuit conductors are enlarged — for voltage drop on a long run, most often — 250.122(B) requires the equipment grounding conductor to be increased in the same proportion. It catches people precisely when they have been conscientious about something else.
NEC 2023 250.122(B)
Ignoring the 250.66 caps and over-buying
The table figure is frequently not the required figure, and the difference is several sizes of expensive copper. Most residential services land on driven rods, where the cap applies — reading the table and stopping there means paying for conductor the code never asked for.
NEC 2023 250.66(A), (B)
Dividing one EGC among parallel raceways
Where a circuit runs in parallel raceways, each raceway needs a full-size equipment grounding conductor sized from the device rating — not one conductor split across the runs, and not a smaller one in each. Each raceway must be able to clear a fault on its own.
NEC 2023 250.122(F)
This tool provides planning estimates. Always verify final values against your local code and a licensed electrician.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a GEC and an EGC?
They do unrelated jobs. A grounding electrode conductor connects the service to the grounding electrode — rods, water pipe, footing rebar — and establishes a reference to earth. An equipment grounding conductor runs alongside a circuit and carries fault current back to the source so a ground fault trips the breaker. One is about earth; the other is about tripping a device. Different tables, different index, not interchangeable in either direction.
What size ground wire do I need for a 100 amp breaker?
8 AWG copper or 6 AWG aluminium, from Table 250.122 — provided the circuit conductors are at their ordinary size, since upsizing them forces the ground up too. Note the phrasing of the question: a 100 amp breaker is a device, so this is the equipment grounding conductor. A 100 amp service being earthed to a ground rod is a different question with a different answer.
What size grounding electrode conductor for 400 kcmil service conductors?
1/0 AWG copper or 3/0 AWG aluminium, from the "over 350 through 600 kcmil" band. In practice you often need far less: the caps in 250.66(A) and (B) hold a run to a driven rod at 6 AWG and to a concrete-encased electrode at 4 AWG, so the full 1/0 is really for a water pipe or a ground ring.
Why is the EGC sized from the breaker rather than the load?
Because it never carries the load. An equipment grounding conductor sits idle until something faults, and then it has one job: pass enough current for long enough to open whatever device is protecting that circuit. A 20 A breaker and a 200 A breaker demand very different amounts of fault current before they let go, which is why the device — and not the load, and not the conductor — is the index.
Can I use aluminium for a grounding electrode conductor?
In principle yes — both tables publish an aluminium column and this calculator gives you both figures. But 250.64(A) restricts where it may physically go, and those restrictions bite hardest on exactly the run people want to use it for. The notes below set out what they are.
Does the grounding conductor have to be bigger than the neutral?
No — they are unrelated sizings and the comparison is not meaningful. The grounded (neutral) conductor is sized to carry unbalanced load current continuously under 220.61, and it is a current-carrying conductor. Grounding conductors carry no current in normal operation and are sized for fault clearing or for earthing. It is entirely normal for them to be smaller than the neutral, and equally normal for a grounding electrode conductor to be larger than an equipment grounding conductor on the same building.